QuoteThis is a Horrible idea. If you think your gonna have so many issues maybe you should not offer international shipping. Vendors dont need to have kinda personal information kept from a buyer after sending their package.I dont see why any buyer would agree to this at allThey're free not to use it, but they'll end up in the first bracket for refunds in the case of a Dispute then. Also I'm not sure you understood exactly what I wrote in my last post, can you explain how I would have access to the address with a HMAC string?QuoteYou should put this effort in to some kick ass stealth tactics.Your going to run in to scammers. theres not much your can do. Only offer a refund with a international seizure letter.Most countries are pretty fast to supply them when something has been confiscated. There's plenty of other issues just than seizures, like incorrect addresses, people using PO Boxes and then not fetching the package if it requires a signature, Poste Restante and Packstations. While you're correct scammers won't be affected they at least won't have grounds to argue on when there's a very clear terms set out.Stealth in itself is not an indicator that can be described as good or bad in relation to all countries, if a package is sent to high risk countries like Sweden or Australia the package always has a risk of getting opened no matter what kind of stealth is inside or outside. If one were to ship a drug like LSD stealth wouldn't even be a factor as Customs is probably focusing as much as LSD as they are on Salvia, in other words not very much.